Skip to main content
NGSS*Middle SchoolEngineering Design

MS-ETS1-1: Defining Criteria and Constraints

Also called NGSS MS-ETS1-1 · Topic: Engineering Design · Engineering, Technology, and Applications of Science

The Official Wording

Define the criteria and constraints of a design problem with sufficient precision to ensure a successful solution, taking into account relevant scientific principles and potential impacts on people and the natural environment that may limit possible solutions.

NGSS Lead States, 2013 · Read it on nextgenscience.org · checked October 15, 2026

What MS-ETS1-1 Means in Plain English

Students take a design problem and define it precisely: the criteria a solution must meet to count as a success, and the constraints that limit it, like cost, time, materials and space. They use measurements and science ideas to make each one specific.

They also ask how a solution could affect people or the environment, since that can rule some ideas out. This builds on 3-5-ETS1-1 and leads to comparing solutions (MS-ETS1-2) and, in high school, HS-ETS1-1.

MS-ETS1-1 I Can Statements

  • I can write criteria that can be measured.
  • I can list the constraints that limit a design.
  • I can explain how science and side effects shape a design problem.

MS-ETS1-1 Worked Example

A class sharpens a fuzzy goal, keeping the classroom basil alive over a four-day weekend, into a problem it can actually test.

The Question

What exactly must a self-watering system do to keep our basil healthy over a four-day weekend?

Set It Up: Four potted basil plants, a kitchen scale, a ruler, a soil moisture meter and a notebook for the class problem statement.

Basil pots and a weekend problem
Moisture meterBasil potKitchen scale40 g a day
What Students Do
  1. Write a first draft of the problem.Draft: keep the plants alive
  2. Weigh each pot every morning for three school days without watering.Each pot loses about 40 g of water a day
  3. Use that loss, plus a safety margin, to set a measurable criterion.Supply at least 200 mL over 4 days
  4. Add a second criterion from the moisture meter.Meter reads 4 to 7 on its 10-point scale all weekend
  5. List the constraints with the teacher and custodian.Under $5, no outlet, fits a 15 cm windowsill
  6. Note side effects the design must avoid.No drips on the heater, reuse old containers
What They Find

The vague goal became two measurable criteria and a clear list of constraints, so every design idea could be judged against the same targets.

Why it works: Plants lose water through their leaves and soil every day, so measuring that loss tells engineers how much water a solution has to supply.

Common Mistakes with MS-ETS1-1

Writing criteria you cannot measure

“The plants should look happy.”

Try this: Turn each goal into a number or a clear test, like at least 200 mL delivered or a meter reading of 4 to 7.

Mixing up criteria and constraints

Listing “must cost under $5” as a goal of the design

Try this: Criteria describe what success looks like. Constraints are the limits you work within, like budget, time, space and materials.

Jumping straight to a solution

“Let's build a bottle drip feeder!” before any problem is written

Try this: Define the problem first. Writing criteria before choosing a design keeps the team open to ideas that might work better.

Where MS-ETS1-1 Fits

Practice MS-ETS1-1

Quick Check

  1. Is “must cost less than $5” a criterion or a constraint?
  2. Why weigh the pots before designing anything?
  3. Name one possible impact on people or the environment this design should consider.

MS-ETS1-1: Other Names

MS-ETS1-1NGSS MS-ETS1-1Defining a design problemCriteria and constraints

Official wording from NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. The plain-English lines and everything else on this page are EMStudio’s own explanations, written beside the official wording. They are not part of the standards.

*NGSS is a registered trademark of WestEd. Neither WestEd nor the lead states and partners that developed the Next Generation Science Standards were involved in the production of this product, and do not endorse it.