RL.3.6: Your Point of View and the Narrator’s
Also written as CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RL.3.6 · Cluster: Craft and Structure.
The Official Wording
Distinguish their own point of view from that of the narrator or those of the characters.
Common Core State Standards, Grade 3, Reading: Literature · Read it at the source · Checked October 14, 2026
What RL.3.6 Means in Plain English
Third graders notice that the narrator or a character can see things one way while they, the readers, see them another. When a magpie narrator calls a lost ring a present, students can say what the magpie believes, what they believe, and which clues back them up.
In 2nd grade (RL.2.6) students noticed that characters see things differently, voicing each one when reading aloud. Third grade adds the reader’s own view. In 4th grade (RL.4.6) students compare stories told in first person and third person.
RL.3.6 I Can Statements
- I can tell what the narrator thinks about what happens.
- I can tell what I think, even when it is different.
- I can use clues from the story to explain my view.
RL.3.6 Worked Example
A narrator who is sure of something the reader can see isn’t true.
Every morning the woman in the yellow house leaves presents for me on her garden table. Today it was a silver ring, shining in the sun.I carried it straight to my nest. It looks wonderful next to my bottle cap and my gum wrapper.Later the woman came out and searched under every flowerpot. She shook out the doormat. She looked in the grass for a long time, and she did not look happy.Poor thing. She must think I didn’t like her present. Tomorrow I will sing extra loud so she knows I did.
Common Mistakes with RL.3.6
Taking the narrator’s word for it
“The woman gave the magpie a present.”
Try this: Ask two separate questions every time: “What does the narrator think?” and “What do you think?” Answer them in separate sentences.
An opinion with no clues
“I think the magpie is wrong.” and nothing more
Try this: Require a because after every “I think,” pointing to a detail the narrator described but misunderstood, like the search under the flowerpots.
Disagreeing about the wrong thing
“I don’t agree because I don’t like magpies.”
Try this: Keep the disagreement about the story’s events: students argue what really happened, using details, not whether they like the character.
Where RL.3.6 Fits
Practice RL.3.6
Quick Check
- Who is telling this story?
- What does the woman do after the ring disappears?
- Why does the magpie plan to sing extra loud tomorrow?