RL.11-12.1: Cite Evidence and Find What the Text Leaves Open
Also written as CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RL.11-12.1 · Cluster: Key Ideas and Details.
The Official Wording
Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text, including determining where the text leaves matters uncertain.
Common Core State Standards, Grades 11-12, Reading: Literature · Read it at the source · Checked October 14, 2026
What RL.11-12.1 Means in Plain English
Juniors and seniors build a reading from strong, thorough evidence, then mark the places where the story refuses to settle the question. When a fisherman’s skiff drifts home empty, the boots and the money tin point two ways, and the best answer quotes both and names the gap.
In grades 9 and 10 (RL.9-10.1) students backed a reading with strong, thorough evidence. Grades 11 and 12 add knowing where that evidence runs out. This is the last band of the line, with no later code: meeting it by the end of grade 12 is college and career readiness.
RL.11-12.1 I Can Statements
- I can quote strong evidence for my reading of a story.
- I can support an inference with lines the text never states outright.
- I can point to where a text leaves a question unresolved.
RL.11-12.1 Worked Example
A wife waits for a husband who never comes home, and the story hands her evidence for two different endings.
The skiff drifted in on the evening tide with no one in it, oars shipped, Joss’s boots in the bow, laced and set side by side.He could not swim. Every man on the island knew it, and every man said so to Hedda that week, as if it settled something.When the constable asked about money, she took down the tin from above the stove. It was empty. She said she had spent it on the roof, and he wrote that down, though the roof still leaked over the bed.Hedda kept his place at the table for a month. Then, without a word to anyone, she began writing letters she posted to the mainland.
Common Mistakes with RL.11-12.1
Forcing one answer
“Joss drowned. Case closed.”
Try this: Ask students to argue the reading they rejected for one paragraph, using the same passage, before they decide what the text settles.
Calling ambiguity a flaw
“The author never tells us what happened, so the ending is confusing.”
Try this: Teach that a deliberate gap is a choice, and have students explain what the story gains by withholding the answer.
Uncertain about everything
“We can’t really know anything about Joss.”
Try this: Separate what the text establishes, like the empty tin, from what it leaves open, and require evidence for both columns.
Where RL.11-12.1 Fits
Practice RL.11-12.1
Quick Check
- What is in the skiff when it drifts back?
- Why is Hedda’s explanation of the empty tin suspicious?
- What does the story never reveal?