Skip to main content
NGSS*3rd GradeLife Science

3-LS4-3: Why Some Living Things Thrive in a Habitat

Also called NGSS 3-LS4-3 · Topic: Interdependent Relationships in Ecosystems: Environmental Impacts on Organisms · Life Science

The Official Wording

Construct an argument with evidence that in a particular habitat some organisms can survive well, some survive less well, and some cannot survive at all.

Clarification statement: Examples of evidence could include needs and characteristics of the organisms and habitats involved. The organisms and their habitat make up a system in which the parts depend on each other.

NGSS Lead States, 2013 · Read it on nextgenscience.org · checked October 15, 2026

What 3-LS4-3 Means in Plain English

Third graders argue, using evidence, that a habitat suits some living things very well, others only a little and some not at all. They match what each plant or animal needs, like water, warmth and food, with what the place offers.

Students treat a habitat and its living things as one system whose parts depend on each other, so a change in one part affects the rest. This builds on 2-LS4-1 and leads to 3-LS4-4, where students judge solutions when a habitat changes.

3-LS4-3 I Can Statements

  • I can list what a plant or animal needs to live.
  • I can tell which living things fit a habitat.
  • I can use evidence to argue why something survives or not.

3-LS4-3 Worked Example

A three-week planting test in a model desert made from a tray of sand.

The Question

Which plants can survive in a dry, sandy habitat?

Set It Up: A tray of sandy soil in a sunny window, watered only once a week, holding a small cactus, a pothos cutting and a row of grass seed.

Sandy tray in a sunny window
CactusPothosGrass seed
What Students Do
  1. Plant all three on the same day and water the tray once a week.Same tray, same water
  2. Check each plant every two or three days and note its color and firmness.Observation log
  3. After one week, compare the plants.Cactus firm, pothos drooping, a few grass sprouts
  4. After three weeks, compare again.Cactus fine, grass thin and brown-tipped, pothos wilted
  5. Sort the plants into three groups: thriving, struggling and not surviving.Cactus / grass / pothos
What They Find

The cactus did well, the grass barely held on and the pothos wilted, all in the same dry habitat.

Why it works: A cactus stores water in its thick stem, so it fits a dry place, while plants that need steady moisture struggle or die there.

Common Mistakes with 3-LS4-3

Thinking all plants need the same things

“Every plant needs lots of water.”

Try this: Compare a cactus with a fern. Each plant has needs that match its usual home, and those needs differ from plant to plant.

Arguing from one observation

Deciding the grass failed after looking once on day two

Try this: Observe over several weeks and record each check. Plants change slowly, so a claim needs evidence from many days.

Leaving out the reason

“The cactus lived.” with no explanation

Try this: Connect the result to a need and a trait: the cactus stores water, so it can last between weekly waterings.

Where 3-LS4-3 Fits

Practice 3-LS4-3

Quick Check

  1. A polar bear is moved to a hot desert. Would it survive well?
  2. Why can a cactus live where it rarely rains?
  3. What is a habitat?

3-LS4-3: Other Names

3-LS4-3NGSS 3-LS4-3Habitats and survivalEcosystems

Official wording from NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. The plain-English lines and everything else on this page are EMStudio’s own explanations, written beside the official wording. They are not part of the standards.

*NGSS is a registered trademark of WestEd. Neither WestEd nor the lead states and partners that developed the Next Generation Science Standards were involved in the production of this product, and do not endorse it.