RST.6-8.6: Author’s Purpose in Science Writing
Also written as CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RST.6-8.6 · Cluster: Craft and Structure.
The Official Wording
Analyze the author's purpose in providing an explanation, describing a procedure, or discussing an experiment in a text.
Common Core State Standards, Grades 6-8, Reading: Science & Technical Subjects · Read it at the source · Checked October 14, 2026
What RST.6-8.6 Means in Plain English
Students in grades 6 to 8 explain why a science writer explains a concept, lays out a procedure or walks through an experiment. A writer describing Redi’s jars of meat step by step is showing how a fair test works, not just reporting where maggots come from.
Fifth graders (RI.5.6) compared accounts of one topic and the point of view each represented. This strand, which begins in grade 6, asks what each part of a science text is for. In ninth and tenth grade (RST.9-10.6) students also define the question the author seeks to answer.
RST.6-8.6 I Can Statements
- I can tell whether a passage explains, gives steps or discusses an experiment.
- I can explain why the author included that part.
- I can name the question an experiment in a text answers.
RST.6-8.6 Worked Example
The author could have given the answer in one line, and the weak answer never asks why the experiment gets three paragraphs instead.
For centuries, people believed that living things could arise from nonliving matter. Rotting meat seemed to turn into maggots, so it was natural to think the meat made them. The idea was called spontaneous generation.In 1668 the Italian physician Francesco Redi tested it. He put pieces of meat in several jars. He left some open, sealed some tightly, and covered others with fine gauze, which let air in but kept flies out.Maggots appeared on the meat in the open jars, where flies had landed. None appeared on the meat in the sealed jars. In the gauze-covered jars, flies laid eggs on the gauze, and maggots hatched there, but not on the meat.The gauze jars mattered most. Critics had argued that sealing a jar kept out the fresh air life needed. Air reached the gauze-covered meat, and still no maggots grew on it.Redi did not end the debate about microscopic life, which went on for nearly two more centuries, but he showed how a fair test can overturn an idea that seems obvious.
Common Mistakes with RST.6-8.6
Naming the topic as the purpose
“The author wants to teach us about maggots.”
Try this: Have students complete “The author describes this so that the reader…” and reject any ending that only names the topic.
Answering “to inform” every time
“The purpose is to inform.” written for every paragraph
Try this: Ban “to inform” on its own and ask what the reader should be able to do or understand after this part.
Missing why one detail is singled out
Treating the gauze jars as one more detail, not the answer to the critics
Try this: Point to any detail the author stresses, like “mattered most,” and ask what doubt or objection it is there to answer.
Where RST.6-8.6 Fits
Practice RST.6-8.6
Quick Check
- What was spontaneous generation?
- Why did Redi cover some jars with gauze?
- What happened in the gauze-covered jars?